WARNING:
JavaScript is turned OFF. None of the links on this concept map will
work until it is reactivated.
If you need help turning JavaScript On, click here.
This Concept Map, created with IHMC CmapTools, has information related to: Mid stage questions, 7 include F1 Are alternative courses of action systematically generated through a process of proactive, goalfocused creation?, Mid-Stage importance level 7, 6 includes D 1 Are all stakeholders systematically and effectively identified, consulted and engaged, in such a way that all stakeholders would agree that they were effectively consulted and engaged?, 6 includes H 2 Are the data managed with an adequate data management system that assures each piece of data is accurately logged, and that appropriate levels of QA/QC are maintained, including the ability to demonstrate that adequate level of QA/QC to a third party?, 6 includes A2 Are the decisions to be supported by this risk analysis clearly identified, including clear descriptions of the decision alternatives?, 6 includes G 7 Has there been explicit consideration of the possibility that some events have been disregarded because of very low probabilities, although those probabilities are based on critical assumptions? That is, have special measures been implemented to check for this type of event (for example, signals and warnings concerning the existing knowledge basis)?, 4 includes I2 Have all calculations in the analysis been verified?, 4 includes I 3 Are all metric levels in results (i.e., nominal, ordinal, interval, ratio) supported by metrically valid operations beginning with the data?, 6 includes B 1.2 Is each scenario spelled out with the causes of change and types of change?, Mid-Stage importance level 4, 5 includes B 4 If the context calls for detecting early warnings, is there a process used for that detection?, Mid-Stage importance level 5, 6 includes B 1.3 Are potential hazards/events/scenarios “not on the list” (surprises, unanticipated events, often referred to as Black Swans) explicitly addressed?, 6 includes J 11 Are the scenarios generated in a process that aggressively tests system interactions?, 6 includes B 1.1 Is there a structured taxonomy of hazards/events that is evidence of comprehensiveness?, 5 includes A 9 Does the risk analysis have an adequate level of breadth, depth and detail to support the risk management decisions being supported?, 5 includes G 4 Is the role and importance of potential surprises and unforeseen events (often referred to as Black Swans) considered?, 5 includes A 1.2 Is the risk/cost of falling short of that goal described?, Mid-Stage importance level 6