Warning:
JavaScript is turned OFF. None of the links on this page will work until it is reactivated.
If you need help turning JavaScript On, click here.
The Concept Map you are trying to access has information related to:
Diversity analysis, Does at least one P have claims against a single D totalling more than $75k? yes Other P's don't have to meet $75k amount in contrv. (supplemental juris applies relieving other P's from statisfying amount), Does at least one P have claims against a single D totalling more than $75k? no aggregatoin among Ps is not allowed; juris amnt not met, Are there mulitple plaintiff's no Does P's claims against single D total more than $75k, Does the amount in controversy exceed $75k fore EVERY ONE of Plaintiff's and Claims? yes There is diversity jurisdiciton, Alienage jurisdiction - is the suit bt a citizen of a state, on one side, and foreign countries, or citizens or subjects thereof, on the other no (only foreigners) There is NO diversity juris, Is diversity complete? Insure its the case that no P is a citizen of same state as any D yes Does the amount in controversy exceed $75k fore EVERY ONE of Plaintiff's and Claims?, Does at least on side consist solely of FOREIGN countries or citizens of foreign countries? (if one US cit on each side ignore foreigners) yes Alienage jurisdiction - is the suit bt a citizen of a state, on one side, and foreign countries, or citizens or subjects thereof, on the other, is the action a class action? yes each named P (but not unnamed Ps) must have claim + $75k, Alienage jurisdiction - is the suit bt a citizen of a state, on one side, and foreign countries, or citizens or subjects thereof, on the other yes Does the amount in controversy exceed $75k fore EVERY ONE of Plaintiff's and Claims?, Does at least on side consist solely of FOREIGN countries or citizens of foreign countries? (if one US cit on each side ignore foreigners) no is a corporation at party?