WARNING:
JavaScript is turned OFF. None of the links on this concept map will
work until it is reactivated.
If you need help turning JavaScript On, click here.
This Concept Map, created with IHMC CmapTools, has information related to: BAAM Paper 2011 Overview, Adequacy of the analysis noting Operant classes of framing responses may be deduced from linguistic descriptions, A BA description depends on identification of variables that control the topographies of utterances and their effect upon the listeners and Many of the responses are controlled by relations between stimuli; much of language involves relational responding, Natural language (i.e., English) is amenable to BA description consistent with known BA principles and A BA description depends on identification of variables that control the topographies of utterances and their effect upon the listeners, Findings/ observations include Primary verbal responses identified as nouns occur in a framing response that allows the listener to respond appropriately to the number and identity of the primary response, Classes of responses develop as generalized operants and These operant response classes can be interpreted as the syntactic constituents identified by linguists and traditional scholars, This framing response frame is an operant class that corresponds to the linguistic notion of inflectional phrase viz., An inflecting framing response, Reasons namely A BA description of an actual language has not been done, A BA description of an actual language has not been done and BA theory has been applied to language from the top down, attempts to inform BA theory from language data have not been tried, This framing response frame is an operant class that corresponds to the linguistic notion of noun phrase viz., A nominalizing framing response, Controlling variables in English nominal and verbal constructions sections include Discussion, Many of the responses are controlled by relations between stimuli; much of language involves relational responding i.e., This relational responding is often diectic (relations defined by context), Claims include Natural language (i.e., English) is amenable to BA description consistent with known BA principles, Controlling variables in English nominal and verbal constructions sections include Reasons, Controlling variables in English nominal and verbal constructions sections include Methods, Controlling variables in English nominal and verbal constructions sections include Findings/ observations, BA theory has been applied to language from the top down, attempts to inform BA theory from language data have not been tried noting BA theory claims there is no difference between verbal behavior and langauge, but no systematic detailed BA descriptions of a have been produced, Primary verbal responses identified as nouns occur in a framing response that allows the listener to respond appropriately to the number and identity of the primary response and Primary verbal responses identified as verbs occur in framing responses that allow the listener to respond appropriately to the time of the action relative to time of the response or another event, Significance of the analysis noting Behavioral analyses such as these may inform current usage-based linguistic theory, These framing responses are autoclitic/ intraverbal frames and These framing responses are largely under the control of abstract relational variables which are often deictic in nature, Efficacy of the analysis noting Recognition of the variables controlling response topographies can lead to more effective teaching techniques