WARNING:
JavaScript is turned OFF. None of the links on this concept map will
work until it is reactivated.
If you need help turning JavaScript On, click here.
This Concept Map, created with IHMC CmapTools, has information related to: BAAM 2017 Case for Syntax - 2, each constituent acts as a discriminative stimulus for the relation between itself and other responses in the frame. This is to say that the sequence of responses in the autoclitic frame acts as as an SD for the relations between the entities "tacted" by the constituent reponses., in American linguistics, research has centered around finding innate properties of language. It is less well known that such theories have always had their detractors,, such theories have always had their detractors, and none of these theories have been proven despite 50 years of research., although autoclitics are commonly thought of as simple grammatical words, all well-formed phrases and clauses can be interpreted as autoclitic frames. This is because The sequence of responses is itself a discriminative stimulus for relations between the constituent responses of the sequence., Linguists typically describe regular sequences in terms of "rules" which are inductive generalizations that describe the sequences., syntactic regularity is due to consistent sequencing of verbal responses, and sequencing of verbal responses can be accounted for behavior-analytically by extending the notion of the autoclitic frame., the sequencing of responses important because sequencing is consistent among members of a verbal community (speakers of a language). Thus, sequencing accounts for the regularity of languages (i.e., responses in a verbal community)., based on associations of responses with exemplars. It also is often accompanied by cognitive explanations of brain functions., Reason number 3 A corollary of this is that each constituent response in an autoclitic sequence is controlled by its own class of stimuli., autoclitic frames are operant responses that sequence other responses. Thus, the various phrasal and clausal sequence types in the repertoires of verbal communities can be interpreted as classes of autoclitic frames, What is syntax? Simply put, syntax refers to the ordering of verbal responses in an utterance., Reason number 1 this means that linguists are looking for an explanation based on a learning theory., Reason number 2 The main argument is syntactic regularity is due to consistent sequencing of verbal responses,, syntax refers to the ordering of verbal responses in an utterance. To make this slightly more precise, syntax concerns the sequences of the components of complex verbal responses., the sequence of responses in the autoclitic frame acts as as an SD for the relations between the entities "tacted" by the constituent reponses. In this way, the listener is able to respond more appropriately to the verbal stimulus., "Usage Based" learning theory is popular. It is based on associations of responses with exemplars., no behavioral--functional explanation has been attempted, so one is offered here., each constituent response in an autoclitic sequence is controlled by its own class of stimuli. and each constituent acts as a discriminative stimulus for the relation between itself and other responses in the frame., sequencing of verbal responses can be accounted for behavior-analytically by extending the notion of the autoclitic frame. Note that autoclitic frames are complex verbal responses that sequence an autoclitic response (often itself complex) and a "primary" response., rules do not explain, they describe. At times, linguists have tried to explain rules as being innate, or deriving from innate capacity.