WARNING:
JavaScript is turned OFF. None of the links on this concept map will
work until it is reactivated.
If you need help turning JavaScript On, click here.
This Concept Map, created with IHMC CmapTools, has information related to: Report stage questions, 6 includes N 1 Are key terms defined?, 6 includes A 7.23 Does the risk analysis support risk management decision makers to address flaws in the risk management processes?, 6 includes A 8 Are the analysis report formats – numerical, graphical and text – explicitly and deliberately designed to be as helpful as possible to risk management decision makers, in combining the results of the analysis with the “other decision factors” they may face in making their decisions?, 4 Includes E 1 Are all important assumptions, and the implications of each such assumption for risk management, listed systematically in language clear to risk management decision makers?, Report Stage importance level 6, 4 importance level 2, 4 Includes A 7.1 Does the risk analysis give risk management decision makers risk information customized to their perspectives?, 3 includes A 7.21 Does the risk analysis support risk management decision makers to understand the limitations of the analyses, and the implications of those limitations for their decisions?, 5 includes L 1 Is the need for robustness and resilience of action strategies explicitly examined?, Report Stage importance level 3, 6 includes N 5 Are all funding sources and amounts fully disclosed?, 3 includes J 4 Is that data-limitation uncertainty characterized in terms risk management decision makers can understand?, 5 includes J 1 Are all of the significant uncertainties listed in one place, and characterized there, and their implications for decisions described there, in terms risk management decision makers can understand? Do those characterizations provide clear answers on the following key questions: What is uncertain? Who is uncertain? What are the main sources of the uncertainties? How are the uncertainties represented or expressed?, 4 Includes I 1 Are all analysis limitations, as they apply to the risk management problem, clearly described?, 5 includes G 1 Is the basis of knowledge characterized? For example: Which inputs are empirically “objective,” which inputs are Subject Matter Expert (SME) elicitation, which inputs are based on testing, which inputs are based on modeling, which knowledge is based on argumentation and reasoning, which aspects are treated with assumptions, which analyses are broadly accepted, which analyses are one of two or more analyses that are considered acceptable, which analyses are novel and not widely accepted?, 4 Includes J 7 Is the propagation of that expert-judgment uncertainty into results uncertainty characterized in terms risk management decision makers can understand?, 2 inludes J 17 Are the implications of that combined uncertainty for risk management decisions made clear to the risk management decision makers, in terms they can understand and apply in their decisions?, 4 importance level 6, 3 includes J 3 Is the propagation of that aleatory uncertainty into results uncertainty characterized in terms risk management decision makers can understand?, 5 includes L 2 Do the recommended risk management strategies that follow from the risk analysis include the robustness and resilience called for by the situation?